Custody-provider coordination
Plan how third-party custody connectivity fits exchange-side deposits, withdrawals, approvals, and operating ownership.
Integration proof
The wallet decision is not only a provider choice. Buyers need a launch-ready operating model for custody assumptions, movement controls, visibility, and exception handling.
Plan how third-party custody connectivity fits exchange-side deposits, withdrawals, approvals, and operating ownership.
Keep address handling, balance visibility, transfer review, and exception paths inside the launch scope instead of treating them as late integrations.
Support wallet architecture choices without locking the launch plan to one provider assumption too early.
Why this matters
Clarify provider fit, operational ownership, and wallet architecture before trading launch decisions harden.
Define user funding, withdrawal review, approval paths, and exception handling before go-live.
Help operations teams understand wallet balances, transfer status, pending actions, and handoff points.
Keep settlement, collection, treasury movement, and post-launch ownership visible to the teams running the exchange.
Custody and architecture decisions
A launch-ready wallet layer starts with a clear decision model: provider assumptions, wallet architecture, movement policy, and the operator roles that sit around them.
Clarify whether the launch depends on third-party custody, internal wallet operations, or a staged model with defined responsibilities.
Map hot, warm, cold, collection, and operational wallet assumptions without claiming one universal architecture fits every launch.
Define how custody providers connect to exchange-side balances, approvals, reporting, and support workflows.
Separate MicroCoins scope, internal exchange operations, custody-provider responsibilities, and post-launch handoff work.
Operator controls
The wallet layer should give teams control over the actions that affect user funds, treasury movement, and operational risk after launch.
Support address issuance and monitoring inside exchange operating flows.
Keep deposit status, withdrawal approvals, and manual review paths tied to exchange operations.
Give operators clearer visibility into available balances, pending movement, and reconciliation concerns.
Plan movement rules around wallet tiers and storage strategy without inventing custody guarantees.
Define approval steps for sensitive wallet actions, treasury movement, and exception resolution.
Surface abnormal activity, stuck transfers, manual interventions, and responsibility boundaries for operations teams.
Deposit and withdrawal flow
Exchange buyers should see how wallet infrastructure supports the path from first deposit to withdrawal review, with visibility and exceptions planned before go-live.
Plan address issuance, deposit detection, confirmation handling, and user-facing status expectations.
Connect wallet activity to exchange-side balances so operators can see when funds become usable.
Define withdrawal request checks, approval paths, provider handoff, and user status updates.
Prepare paths for delayed transfers, mismatched balances, manual review, and support escalation.
Integration-ready surface
Keep the exchange-side wallet layer flexible enough for custody-provider coordination, internal tooling, and future operating change.
API-oriented wallet integration for exchange-side balances, movements, and status visibility
A clearer path to coordinate custody-provider changes without rewriting the launch story
Support internal extension for operations, reporting, support, and treasury workflows
Buyer decision checklist
Use these questions to keep the wallet discussion grounded in launch risk, operator ownership, and day-two operations.
Clarify provider assumptions, internal ownership, wallet tiers, and the controls required before user funds move.
Confirm address issuance, confirmations, balance posting, status visibility, and support ownership.
Define review logic, approval roles, provider handoff, limits, and exception paths.
List the balance, transfer, pending action, and alert views needed for daily operations.
Separate settlement, collection, operating liquidity, reconciliation, and treasury movement responsibilities.
Define the team responsible for stuck transfers, manual review, suspicious movement, and customer escalation.
Settlement and treasury handoff
A wallet launch is incomplete if settlement, collection, treasury movement, and operating handoff are not clear to finance, operations, and support teams.
Keep transfer status and settlement expectations visible enough for operations and finance to coordinate.
Clarify how assets move between operational wallets, custody paths, and treasury-controlled destinations.
Plan the handoff between wallet events, exchange balances, operations review, and finance reconciliation.
Define who responds to exceptions, provider questions, support escalations, and operating changes after launch.
Delivery confidence
MicroCoins frames wallet infrastructure as part of exchange launch readiness, not a disconnected custody logo or consumer-wallet feature list.
Wallet infrastructure consultation
Talk through custody model, wallet architecture, funding flows, balance visibility, operator controls, and treasury handoff before implementation starts.